Back to the new wifi.com website.

WiFi.community HotSpots Community Shop FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

Go Back   WiFi.community > WiFi.com Introvenous > Municipal (city-wide) Wireless Internet > Western Wireless Internet > San Francisco Wireless Internet
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

San Francisco Wireless Internet Post or read here about the San Francisco municipal wireless Internet system being deployed by Earthlink.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2007, 05:02 PM
WiFi.com's Avatar
WiFi.com WiFi.com is offline
WiFi Goodness!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 12,036
WiFi.com is a glorious beacon of lightWiFi.com is a glorious beacon of lightWiFi.com is a glorious beacon of lightWiFi.com is a glorious beacon of lightWiFi.com is a glorious beacon of lightWiFi.com is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via ICQ to WiFi.com Send a message via AIM to WiFi.com Send a message via Yahoo to WiFi.com
Lightbulb San Francisco WiFits.

The wireless Internet system in San Francisco is caught up in a political quagmire.

The Mayor, Gary Newsom, signed a contract with Earthlink and Google to deploy a free and "pay for" wirelesss Internet network in the city, but it appears not everyone is on board with this plan.

One argument is the city should fund the network itself and use a fiber-based system with some areas of "wifi" connection. This would be costly to the city - which in the short and long term means the citizens of San Francisco will be paying for it.

The current plan is to have an outside business (Earthlink) foot the cost of implementing and maintaining the system. However, for faster speeds you would be required to pay a monthly fee. This doesnt sound too unreasonable if you consider they will be footing the bill for the whole thing.

It appears most of the pushback is based upon how reliable and fast the network will be. Considering most municipal networks already in operation are having some issues we can understand the concern. However, these networks are in their infancy and technologies such as WiMax (which would play a role in the larger networks) are behind WiFi when it comes to certification and implementation. Understandably the WiMax industry is attempting to avoid the fragmentation issues which are evident with WiFi.

Bottom line, San Francisco needs to do what is best for the citizens and considering every option is really the best way to approach building a wireless network of this size.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WiFi "hotzone" concept gets too hot for San Francisco and its mayor - newswireless.net WiFi.com WiFi News 0 01-27-2007 10:31 AM
Free WiFi Coming to San Francisco While Pasadena Waits Nobly ... - Blogcritics.org WiFi.com WiFi News 0 01-07-2007 11:05 AM
San Francisco WiFi Deal Close To Approval - Internet Financial News WiFi.com WiFi News 0 01-06-2007 05:25 PM
San Francisco, Google, Earthlink Finalize City Wide WiFi Deal - Gizmodo.com WiFi.com WiFi News 0 01-06-2007 06:19 AM
San Francisco WiFi Deal Close To Approval - Internet Financial News WiFi.com WiFi News 0 01-04-2007 07:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


WiFi.com - All Rights Reserved - 2007